By Gary Heseltine
Editor UFO Truth Magazine
Translation by Almir Arruda
UFO Team
Since the pivotal publication of the New York Times article on December 16, 2017, the number of significant developments on the issue of UAPs, especially in the United States, has been steadily increasing. 2023 turned out to be a historic year, as it was when the first US Congressional Hearing for Witnesses was held in July. This hearing introduced the world to David Grusch, a former US Air Force intelligence officer.
During that hearing, Grusch made startling claims under oath that the U.S. was in possession of crashed UAPs and that there was a decades-old program to reverse-engineer non-human technologies. He also said that “biological products” had also been found.
In addition to Grusch, two former military pilots, David Fravor and Ryan Graves, testified about their own encounters with UAPs on the East and West coasts of the United States. The impact of this hearing on the international mainstream media was initially significant, especially because of the proposed legislation on UAPs known as the Schumer Amendment. The legislation introduced a proposed bill—the UAP Disclosure Act of 2023. The legislation used the term “nonhuman intelligence” more than 20 times, and at times it seemed as if a “disclosure” was on the verge of being made.
However, when the bill was set to be signed by President Biden in late 2023, several high-ranking senators came forward to effectively “gut” Schumer’s legislation of many of its key provisions. The original 63-page bill was cut to just 19 pages, and its impact was significantly weakened.
This unexpected shift led to a number of other negative developments on the UAP issue, including the release of Volume 1 of the All-Domain Anomaly Resolution Office (AARO) Historical Report.
The report has been called by many researchers one of the weakest attempts to explain the UAP issue, with some claiming it was a travesty of the truth, similar to the infamous Condon Report* published in 1968. The report lacked evidence to support its negative conclusions about UAPs and rejected direct testimony given to it by retired military personnel, including Bob Jacobs (of the 1964 Big Sur Accident) and Robert Salas (of the 1967 nuclear missile shutdown at Malmstrom Air Force Base, Montana).
The impact of Condon's negative conclusions directly influenced the termination of the Project...
Read the full article.
Comments